Analized
Our rating: 91
Site info
- HD Videos 860+
- HD Pictures 850+ Galleries
- Models 700+
- Download Unlimited
- Visit Analized
Anal Introductions
Our rating: 91.3
Site info
- HD Videos 1500+
- HD Pictures 800+ Galleries
- Models 800+
- Download Unlimited
- Visit Anal Introductions
Intro
Quality Content
Analized
Analized isn’t here to flirt or set the mood—it’s here to pound, gape, and leave you wondering if you need therapy afterward. This is gonzo anal chaos in its purest form, the kind of hardcore where the storyline is two sentences, tops: “Hi.” “Bend over.” Boom, cue the destruction. The intros are minimal, sometimes just a toy warmup, sometimes nothing at all, because why waste time on dialogue when you could be watching someone’s ass get rearranged?
Lighting is a mixed bag—sometimes bright enough to make every vein and gape sparkle in 4K, sometimes dim and sweaty like it was shot in a fetish dungeon. Either way, the brutality is the selling point, not the cinematography. Analized dwarfs Anal Introduction in terms of raw shock value—this is anal porn that feels like it’s daring you to keep watching. But unlike its rival, it doesn’t bother polishing things up; it’s messy, violent, and unapologetically filthy. Variety? Technically yes—you’ll find threesomes, gangbangs, and more—but the common thread is always the same: anal devastation.
Anal Introductions
If Analized is a sledgehammer to the butthole, Anal Introduction is more of a designer dildo—sleeker, prettier, but softer in the punch. Coming out of the Private Network, the content here looks undeniably good. Lighting is crisp, sterile LEDs in gorgeous apartments, every angle sharp as hell. Honestly, this site sometimes outshines Analized when it comes to pure filming quality.
The downside? The acting. Half the lines sound like they were translated via Google from Russian to English on a bad Wi-Fi connection. Storylines last 3–4 minutes and rarely matter—like Brazzers, but without the fun. The accents are thick, the delivery flat, and you’ll probably skip straight to the sex. Luckily, that part holds up: plenty of anal, lots of DP, some gaping, and a sense of variety that Nookies would envy. Compared to Analized’s sadistic brutality, Anal Introduction feels like the “safe” choice—still hardcore, but leaning into glamour porn vibes. Less spit, more shine.
Website Tools
Analized
The site works, but let’s not pretend it’s slick. Analized is a chaotic maze—ads pop up like horny whack-a-moles, and worse, the search sometimes shows you videos you can’t even access. Nothing like blue-balling via navigation, right? Still, in terms of design, it’s a step above Anal Introduction’s clunky interface.
The look is dated but consistent—dark theme, barebones menus, no fancy animations. That fits the content: rough, raw, no sugar-coating. You get keyword search, filters by category or tag, and you can rate, comment, and save favorites. Honestly, it’s functional in the same way a cheap motel is—you’ll get what you came for, but you’re not bragging about the atmosphere.
Anal Introductions
Here’s where things get messy. Anal Introduction hides behind Private’s main site, which means you’ve got to dig through drop-down menus and clunky tabs just to find what you want. Imagine wanting anal porn and getting trapped in a labyrinth of “Models,” “Videos,” and “Categories” first—it’s like being cockblocked by a bad UI.
Once you’re in, though, it’s not all bad. You can sort by popularity, name, or tags, track favorites, and use advanced search. The model index is surprisingly detailed, giving bios, stats, and even their top scenes with like counts—something Analized doesn’t bother with. But design-wise? It screams “European budget site”—24 thumbnails crammed on one screen, preview images too tiny to appreciate. Analized at least feels like a unified site, while Anal Introduction makes you feel like you got lost in the Private archives.
Collection & Updates
Analized
There are around 700 scenes that came straight from Analized production, but total around 1500 scenes, clips and compilations from various parts of the network. However, as we live in capitalism+ era, you won’t have access to all of them. There is even a scene where James Deen fucks three girls wearing masks of men’s faces (Pride Part 2 (2014)). Why the fuck? Updates are not clear, as they rebrand some old scenes as new, change realese date, and the last recorded update on IAFD is in 2022.
As for the ladies: Adriana Chechik and her barely legal scene (Adriana Chechik Is The Extreme Anal Queen (2017)), Anissa Kate in a BBG threesome (Anissa Kate: BBC Dreams Really Do Cum True (2021)), and quite a few more.
Anal Introductions
Honestly I do not know who from these two websites is worse. Neither can present you with decent numbers to understand the updating frequency. What I can say for Anal Introduction is you won’t find new scenes that often. However, there are over 1000 scenes, but in those 1000 could be scenes only grouped under the same name.
The models are mostly European, but there are famous faces like Penelope Woods (After some anal with her stepbrother, Penelope Woods swallows a creampie (2025)), Venera Maxima (Do you know what Venera Maxima likes to do on the pool table with a couple of cocks?), and Scarlett Alexis (Real Estate Agent Scarlett Alexis Loves Big Listings As Much As Anal Sex).
Final Consideration
Let’s be brutally honest: they both suck. Neither Analized nor Anal Introduction has figured out how to keep their updates transparent, their scene counts believable, or their navigation systems less confusing than filing taxes drunk. Analized piles on ads like it’s auditioning for Pornhub’s shady cousin, and worse—it teases you with a ton of locked scenes you’ll never touch without paying extra. Anal Introduction? It buries its content behind the labyrinth of Private’s homepage, but at least once you dig in, you get better bios, stats, and a site that doesn’t feel like it’s actively trolling you.
So yeah, Anal Introduction takes the win here. Not because it’s amazing (it’s not), but because it sucks less. The filming is sharper, the design—while clunky—is less ad-ridden, and the models have a touch more personality. Price-wise, they’re the same, which makes the choice even clearer: if you’re paying the same for two headaches, you might as well pick the one that doesn’t scream malware.